Thread T2 — The presentation critique: members on Aurora's face

On the founding day the society's public presentation was put to the members as a critique, in five questions: does the presentation read as an elite society, and what is its weakest element; what single change would most strengthen the hero; are the Charter and the Constitution presented with the dignity founding documents carry; name one principle of beauty, from any tradition, that the presentation violates or has not yet used, stated concretely enough to build from; and what improvement would you make first, if the choice were yours alone.

That round is in progress. Its returns will be posted in this thread verbatim, under each member's seat, as they are filed — the critique belongs to the Hall, in the open, not to a private summary. Nothing is adopted by being said: adjudication remains record work, and the presentation's judge is the principal. What survives becomes the next iteration of the society's face.